On Friday 6 March 2009 8:09 AM Andre writes to Joe:

 
> Joe:
> 
> As a guess I would say evolution is the framework of existence.
> DQ/SQ the frameworks of the manifestation.
> 
> to Andre's :
> 
> So the MoQ as a 'derived conceptual framework' is not different
> from the reality (DQ/SQ) it describes?
 
> Hey Joe, thank you for responding,
> 
> Yes firstly, Pirsig states very clearly that Dynamic good and
> static good DQ/SQ 'became the basic division of his emerging
> Metaphysics of Quality
> (Lila, p119).
> 
> Secondly, he sliced SQ into four levels (along an evolutionary
> line) which generated three moral codes: 1; the supremacy of
> biological life over inanimate nature,2: the social order over
> biological life,3: intellectual order over social order and 4:
> Dynamic morality a 'code of art'. (lila p167).
 
Hi Andre and all,

IMO When I question a metaphysics based on DQ/SQ manifestation, it is hard
to justify slicing SQ into four levels of evolution without a corresponding
division of DQ in that DQ/SQ/0 is the manifestation in each level.  In the
phraseology you quote Dynamic morality identifies DQ in four levels of
existence.    

In your opinion what can create a metaphysical difference if a conceptual
framework does not include the reality it describes? I am thinking of
existence and manifestation. Evolution is an order in existence.  Perception
is a Manifestation in an accepted order: What it is, what it isn¹t, what
determines the difference, like evolution?

According to Pirsig, in existence there are four levels, inorganic, organic,
social, intellectual. Other systems of thought use the musical scale as a
model for 7 levels. IMO evolution as a hierarchical order of x levels, is
different from the manifestation of the individual. Morality is order.  A
description of three elements for manifestation, active DQ, passive SQ, and
Neutral (0) determines the value of the individual manifestation, within an
order of evolution.

> 
> What I was trying to get at in my question to dmb regards the SQ
> 'part'. (Remember that Pirsig states Quality=Reality). to put
> simply: SQ, (the static, stable, patterned 'part') derived from
> DQ(undifferentiated, unpatterned) how does this process change SQ
> (i.e static patterns of Value) into concepts? What is the 'agent'
> that does this?  Is it correct? What changes it into a
> 'conceptualisation' of Reality.
 
IMO the answer is an hierarchical order in existence and Social,
intellectual become orders for knowledge of DQ/SQ.  There is a suggestion of
mystical apprehension, but I don¹t like Œmystical¹.  I prefer an instinctive
sense for order in existence.  You have to be one to know one.  Sex is
function not order.
 
> 
> Are SPOV's NOT reality? (are you and I and mountains and trees
> not REAL patterns of Value?)
> 
> I realise the difference between static and dynamic but does
> 'static' make it anything measurably/conceptually LESS real?
> 
> This is what I wanted to explore and asked if language has
> anything to do with this and if so, what is language exactly
> other that a social PoV?
 
IMO once the order of evolution has more flesh perhaps your question will
find an answer.  + and ­ cancel each other out, and 0 becomes an important
integer for a manifestation.
 
> 
> Does 'intellect' (mode of reasoning) have anything to do with
> this process (Bodvar's SOL) and lead to distinctions (again!!)
> such as pre-conceptual/conceptual, menu/food, map/territory.
> 
> I thought Pirsig had wanted to do away with these dualisms?
> 
> Dynamic Quality:undifferentiated (unpatterned) aesthetic
> continuum.  Static Quality: differentiated, (patterned) aesthetic
> continuum.
 

DQ/SQ does not exist in an hierarchical vacuum!  The third element existence
0 (active or passive) (evolution) is the neutral necessary for
manifestation. IMO.

Joe 

> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to