Platt to Andre:
Yes, we are static patterns of Quality. But we are not DQ. DQ is something
we perceive and, under some circumstances, respond to.

Andre:
Hi Platt, I like this beginning. It points to something that has bothered me
for a while, the resolution of which needs to be thrashed out here because
if we don't, the MoQ will be just another philosophical brick in the wall,
or just another philosophical picture on the wall. And it ain't.
I'll try to explain it below but cannot promise many quotes. It has to do
with the interpretation of these quotes.

Platt:
Otherwise, how to explain:
"This, Phaedrus thought, was why little children are usually quicker to
PERCEIVE Dynamic Quality than old people, why beginners are usually quicker
than experts, why primitive people are sometimes quicker than those of
'advanced' cultures." (Lila, 9)

Andre:
My interpretation of this quote is that Pirsig argues for LESS
intellectualisations (conceptualisations,rationalisations, evaluations,) as
is the case with old people and 'advanced' cultures since these only
obstruct the perception of DQ. I interpret the 'perception of' to mean 'have
feeling for'/ 'be open to'. Remember Zen's Beginners Mind? Remember Pirsig's
value traps? One of them is value rigidity. Children do not have this (they
haven't gone through the hypnotists educational factory yet). "Primitive '
societies do not have this either. That's why they are probably called
'primitive'.(by educated anthropologists).
Value rigidity..'is an inability to revalue what one sees because of
commitment to previous values' (ZMM, p304). Old people and advanced cultures
have these values. Children, unconsciously have/see/feel only one value and
that is Dynamic. (That is why they are little, selfish exhausting,
loveable bastards sometimes!).

Platt:
 "The patterns of life are constantly evolving in RESPONSE to something
'better' than that which these laws have to offer." (Lila, 11)

Andre:
Agree, and Pirsig is very consistent in his analysis and exposition of this.
'All life is a migration of static patterns of quality toward Dynamic
Quality (Lila, p143). And how do they do this? Read his analysis of what
happens at the quantum level; 'Particles 'prefer' to do what they do. An
individual particle is not absolutely committed to one predictable
behaviour' (p107).

Now read p106: 'Lila is a judge. That's who lay here beside him tonight: a
judge of hundreds of millions of year's standing...' Lila judges, not in the
sense of passing a verdict but in terms of picking and choosing...who
is/what is better? She shows preference! She responds and it is in this
response that DQ is experienced.
Added to this comes the 'mystical' component upon which a large part of the
MoQ is based (Interview Pirsig in On the Road DVD).
Dharma is equated with Quality itself and on p 391 Pirsig writes: 'It
[dharma] is sometimes used as a purely moral concept and stands for right or
virtuous conduct which leads to some form of good as a result'.
In this context we are all composed of patterns of dharma (SQ) responding to
DQ. But this relationship is not one of responding from 'in here' to 'out
there'.This dualism does not exist in the MoQ. It is DQ/SQ. The only
'difference is, the one is unpatternd (DQ) the other is patterned (SQ). The
one exists in the other and the other exists in the one.

Platt:
As for DQ being a force, like energy, one need only refer to such
statements as:
"Biological evolution can be seen as a process by which weak DYNAMIC FORCES
at the subatomic level DISCOVER strategems for overcoming huge static
inorganic forces at a superatomic level." (Lila, 11)
and
"Natural selection is Dynamic Quality AT WORK." (Lila, 11)

"Although Dynamic Quality, the Quality of freedom, CREATES THIS WORLD in
which we live, these patterns of static quality, the quality of order,
preserve our world." (Lila, 9)

Andre:
Absolutely and there is no contradiction here. Pirsig merely reinforces the
workings at the quantum level which manifest themselves with greater variety
and freedom at subsequent levels; i.e exercising preference and, when
successful, exploiting and 'latching' the advance gained. This is how the
world has been created.

Platt:
Pirsig makes it clear through the story of the brujo and in other places
that it is the individual responding to the creative force of DQ that is
currently driving social and intellectual evolution.

Andre:
Yes, and following on from the above when talking about Lila: 'There's
something ferociously Dynamic going on with her (p165-6): the same thing was
happening with the brujo (his 'stange' behaviour) and Pirsig says:' He was
just following some vague sense of 'betterness' that couldn't  have been
defined if he had wanted to'.
This 'sense' of betternes was 'sensed' inside used in the sense of dharma
and Quality. (DQ/SQ)

Platt:
If someone has a contrary view, they ought to be able to support it with
the evidence of quotations from Pirsig's writings after ZMM when he
discovered the existence of Dynamic and static quality within the broader
category of Quality.

Andre:
And this is the problem Platt: It is not Quality/ MoQ. NO!!!
 '...Dynamic good and static good...became the basic division of his
emerging Metaphysics of Quality.
'Not subject and object but static and Dynamic is the basic division of
reality'. (p119).

And the subject/ object became static patterns of value, and Dq 'is a
referring term for immediate experience' i.e. DQ (McWatt,1999)

No more 'ins and outs', pre-concept/concept, abstract/concrete. NO!!!
DQ/SQ!

Platt:
As you say, Andre, DQ is not something "out there." It is part of the
Quality experience. But it not part of everyday experience. It's rare and
wonderful:
"It was applied to manifestations of skill, fortune, blessing, luck, to any
wondrous occurrence. It connoted any phenomenon that transcended the run of
everyday experience. In other words, 'Dynamic Quality.' " (Lila, 9)

Andre:
No qualms here Platt. Some profound/ religious/ mystical experiences do not
occur every day. And I do not rely on those to get me out of bed every
morning...but sometimes...you just never will know.

If you do not agree with any or all of this Platt ..I'll hear.

And now it is time for a beer!

IMHO
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to