> [Platt]
> If someone is going to talk about the MOQ it would be nice if he read the
> book
> wouldn't it?
> 
> [Arlo]
> Too funny. Nice distraction try though. But yes, let's take the quote you
> just
> offered (again) and return the woeful rhetoric of your latest posts.
> 
> "Dynamic Quality, the source of all things, the pre-intellectual cutting
> edge
> of reality, always appears as "spur of the moment" Where else could it
> appear?"
> (Lila, 11)
> 
> DQ is the "cutting edge of reality". OK. That's what I've been saying at
> every
> step of the way.
> 
> The you say, "DQ ONLY appears as the spur of the moment, not constantly as
> the
> you stupidly claim."
> 
> So here we are with a "spur of the moment" that does not appear
> constantly.
> 
> Let's combine this into Plattitude A.
> 
> "Dynamic Quality... always appears as the "spur of the moment", and this
> "spur
> of the moment" does not appear constantly."
> 
> You then said of me. "Obviously you have never experienced DQ. It has
> never
> appeared to you." (Platt)
> 
> Let's combine this with Plattitude A.
> 
> "Dynamic Quality... always appears as the "spur of the moment", and this
> "spur
> of the moment" does not appear constantly. You have never experienced the
> "spur
> of the moment". The "spur of the moment" has never appeared to you."
> 
> Ai yi yi.
> 
> Now let's add another whopper of yours.
> 
> "How on earth can any human being experience DQ when it only appears as
> "spur
> of the moment." In other words, how can anyone experience that which
> doesn't
> appear to him?" (Platt)
> 
> Let's combine.
> 
> "Dynamic Quality... always appears as the "spur of the moment", and this
> "spur
> of the moment" does not appear constantly. You have never experienced the
> "spur
> of the moment". The "spur of the moment" has never appeared to you. How
> on
> earth can any human being experience the "spur of the moment", since it
> doesn't
> appear to him?"
> 
> So first I am rhetorically assaulted for never having "the spur of the
> moment"
> appear to me, but you said clearly it can never appear to anyone! 
> 
> So dreadful. I understand why your only recourse here is the inane
> rhetoric of
> talk-radio, but good god man, you're embarrassing yourself!
> 
> Apparently, reading the book is not enough, Platt. You have to understand
> it.
> Something you, apparently, simply do not do.
> 
> Don't misunderstand, these rhetorical gems are keepers. Keep tossin' 'em,
> maybe
> all the maimed angels will actually get a chuckle.
> 
> DQ is "the ongoing Dynamic edge of experience". Not "some". Not the
> "occasional". ALL. Period. 
> 
> ALL experience is Quality, and contains in that the seeds of chance,
> uncertainty, that is DQ, the cutting edge, the zero-moment. We experience
> this
> every second of every day.

Please continue peeing all over yourself. It's funny and sad at the same 
time.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to