>[Marsha] >...ever-changing, collection of interrelated > and interconnected, inorganic, biological, >social and intellectual, static patterns of value > responding to Dynamic Quality...
[Krimel] >You are seriously trying my patience, to the point that is becomes ever more >difficult to answer with civility. If you strip away the conceptual patterns >from any explanation including yours; which by the way sounds like a badly >worded corporate mission statement, you are left with exactly Marsha I do not care if my words do not match your artistic height, that is not my point. [Krimel] I am sorry, it must have been late; "badly worded corporate mission statement" is redundant. Your MoQ mission statement is like a snake devouring itself: circular, full of itself, self defeating and vague like someone talking with their mouth full. It is entirely conceptual in the dismissive sense of "JUST conceptual." But as I said before if you leave concepts out of discourse what your get is > > > > > > > I hope you find that explanation more clear. If not try painting it green. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
