At 01:02 PM 3/26/2009, you wrote:
> >[Marsha]
> >...ever-changing, collection of interrelated
> > and interconnected, inorganic, biological,
> >social and intellectual, static patterns of value
> > responding to Dynamic Quality...
>
>[Krimel]
> >You are seriously trying my patience, to the point that is becomes ever
>more
> >difficult to answer with civility. If you strip away the conceptual
>patterns
> >from any explanation including yours; which by the way sounds like a
badly
> >worded corporate mission statement, you are left with exactly
>
>Marsha
>I do not care if my words do not match your artistic height, that is
>not my point.
>
>[Krimel]
>I am sorry, it must have been late; "badly worded corporate mission
>statement" is redundant. Your MoQ mission statement is like a snake
>devouring itself: circular, full of itself, self defeating and vague like
>someone talking with their mouth full. It is entirely conceptual in the
>dismissive sense of "JUST conceptual."
>
>But as I said before if you leave concepts out of discourse what your get
is
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>I hope you find that explanation more clear. If not try painting it green.
Marsha
If you are not an ever-changing, collection of interrelated and
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual,
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality, please tell
me what you are?
[Krimel]
"I" am the Dynamic Quality your mission statement so lamely attempts to
capture.
Like cock-a-doodle-doo?
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
