At 09:49 AM 3/26/2009, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>...ever-changing, collection of interrelated
> and interconnected, inorganic, biological,
>social and intellectual, static patterns of value
> responding to Dynamic Quality...
[Krimel]
>You are seriously trying my patience, to the point that is becomes ever
more
>difficult to answer with civility. If you strip away the conceptual
patterns
>from any explanation including yours; which by the way sounds like a badly
>worded corporate mission statement, you are left with exactly
Marsha
I do not care if my words do not match your artistic height, that is
not my point.
[Krimel]
I am sorry, it must have been late; "badly worded corporate mission
statement" is redundant. Your MoQ mission statement is like a snake
devouring itself: circular, full of itself, self defeating and vague like
someone talking with their mouth full. It is entirely conceptual in the
dismissive sense of "JUST conceptual."
But as I said before if you leave concepts out of discourse what your get is
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I hope you find that explanation more clear. If not try painting it green.
Krimel,
If you are not an ever-changing, collection of interrelated and
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual,
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality, please tell
me what you are?
Marsha
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
