> Ron wrote > You touch on a very important point, in MoQ, the term morality takes > on a different meaning, it's not a guide > to distinguish right from wrong or even the common understanding of > betterness, but the understanding > of tendancies toward certain types static patterns and their > relationships.
MP: I take issue with that statement, Ron. I don't think it is accurate to MoQ. Quality implies what humans perceive as "better" over "worse." Without that distinction, Quality is meaningless. Pirsig goes into great detail to show this in ZMM. These "certain types" of patterns toward which things tend in Quality experience are "better" than the one from which they tend. MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
