Marsha, Willblake2 --
What's all this about Science Wars in the 1990s?
Science and religion have always been in conflict ideologically, and I could
see how the Scopes trial of 1925 might be regarded as the opening skirmish
in the "battle" between the Darwinians and the Creationists. But science
wars in the 1990s in which, Marsha (the sophist) conjectures, "RMP led the
attack against Science"...?
To see what I'd missed in the last decade, I checked Wikipedia (which seemed
to be the only reference), and learned that the cultural journal 'Social
Text' was the first to use the term in May 1996 when it ran a "Science Wars"
issue with essays contributed by controversial writers in the social
sciences and humanities. Among the contributors was Alan Sokal, who
submitted a paper purporting to argue that quantum physics supported
postmodernist criticism of scientific objectivity. Sokal, a physicist,
later confessed it was a "...hoax to see if the journal editors would
"publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good
and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions". The incident
became known as "the Sokal Affair".
In a 2001 book titled "Making Social Science Matter", Dr. Bent Flyvbjerg,
writes: "However entertaining for bystanders, the mudslinging of the Science
Wars is unproductive. The Wars undoubtedly serve political and ideological
purposes in the competition for research funds and in defining what Charles
Lindblom and Michel Foucault have called society's 'truth politics.' Judged
by intellectual standards, however, the Science Wars are misguided."
My Google search also revealed that Wikipedia has itself been criticized for
promulgating a case for the Science Wars. Stuart Geiger, a Georgetown U.
graduate who has submitted a number of articles to Wiki, notes: "Instead of
debating about the efficacy and authority of science, academics are now
debating the efficacy and authority of Wikipedia." He's probably on to
something.
Personally, I think the so-called "wars" are overblown if not actually
bogus. Despite the hand-wringing of Nicholas Maxwell and others who would
"humanize" the methodology of Science, the empiricists should continue doing
what they have done so brilliantly for more than a century, and the
philosophers and social scientists should have the wisdom to get off their
back.
(That's my opinion anyway.)
--Ham
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
