Not irrelevant, just not understood. - Marsha
At 06:39 AM 4/16/2009, you wrote:
Marsha, yes, apparently we are very different.
You usually put song lyrics as a first email with its own subject. I take a
look at the lyrics and then simply choose part of its context that i then
juxtapose with a Don van Vleit lyric - so your song contexts are fine - its
probably my replies that seem irrelevant.
-KO
2009/4/16 MarshaV <[email protected]>
>
> KO,
>
> You keep insinuating that I know something of what you are stating. I may
> or may not. The context of your statements are probably very
different than
> the context of my hearing them. You and I are very different
constellations
> of static patterns of value. There will be shared patterns but I would bet
> the relationships between them are more different than the same. So no, I
> don't "know that". You put sex and violence into a context I would never
> consider them. And I bet I put song lyrics into a context that seems
> irrelevant.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
> At 02:29 AM 4/16/2009, you wrote:
>
>> Marsha,
>>
>> i was not trying to prompt a discussion about sex and violence and you
>> know
>> that; i was merely highlighting a 'pattern' that for me in no way can be
>> said to be true - it just aint good english!
>> When someone uses a word in an unfamiliar way ' all patterns are true' it
>> is
>> they who must define what they mean.
>>
>> -KO
>>
>> 2009/4/15 MarshaV <[email protected]>
>>
>> >
>> > KO,
>> >
>> > Maybe you can define what you mean by true and real. Is there a
>> > difference between experience and patterns? Are the experience of
>> loving
>> > the same as one's thoughts about love? I suppose that depends on how
>> much
>> > one is willing to ignore the thoughts and be with the experience. Is
>> maybe
>> > real, like in reality, a series of nanoseconds of experience?
>> >
>> > I would prefer not to link sex and violence even in a post, so let's
>> drop
>> > it. I've dropped cable and network television from my life for that
>> very
>> > reason. Has something awful slipped through with my lyrics?
>> >
>> >
>> > Marsha
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > At 01:25 PM 4/15/2009, you wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Marsha,
>> >> sorry if you received this twice - i got a 40k limit rejection message
>> >> that
>> >> i think applied to this email originally - i've cut out most of the
>> >> associated quoted text now.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> i think the patterns are real - not true.
>> >> When a woman or man starts to identify sex with violence then at same
>> time
>> >> they start associate violence with sex when it should be love. How can
>> >> this
>> >> be called true? It does not make sense to me. -KO
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 2009/4/13 MarshaV <[email protected]>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> KO,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What do you think?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> m
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> At 04:13 AM 4/13/2009, you wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hello KO,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Well, wanting a cigarette is sometimes still an experience for me.
>> >> I've
>> >> >>> actually thought of getting a dozen cartons and seeing if I could
>> >> smoke
>> >> >>> every cigarette within twenty-four hours. But I I haven't yet. I
>> >> stopped
>> >> >>> smoking because I thought a full breath was more fun than a labored
>> >> breath.
>> >> >>> (I live in a stairmaster.) That seemed true at the time, but...
>> >> Also, I
>> >> >>> live alone, so there was no one I would be in danger of killing.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> All these static patterns of value are true. Unless, of course,
>> one
>> >> has
>> >> >>> discovered they are all false.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Marsha
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> >> Archives:
>> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> >>
>> >
>> > .
>> > _____________
>> >
>> > Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the
>> stars.........
>> > .
>> > .
>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> > Archives:
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> >
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>
> .
> _____________
>
> Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
> .
> .
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
