Hi Platt,

Just a pet peeve of mine.  When I hear "created by the universe", it sounds 
like, separate from.  We are the universe.  We are the big bang in action.  We 
are not a product of the universe.  Otherwise I agree with you.  By the way, 
which direction is the universe?

Cheers,
Willblake2

On Apr 18, 2009, at 3:49:40 PM, "Platt Holden" <[email protected]> wrote:
KO, Krimel, et al:. 

The universe exhibits purpose in every bug that crawls, every bird that 
flies and everyone who posts to moq_discuss. It seems never to occur to 
those who are enamored of a materialistic worldview that they were created 
by the universe, are part and parcel of it, and exhibit purpose with every 
breath they take. 

Platt



> -KO
> in Chapter 11 i think Pirsig offers the MoQ as both an underpinning of
> evolutionary theory and as a philosophical explanation of teleology, and
> i
> can accept both: there is virtual teleology in human life. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> What Pirsig seems want in his account of evolution is similar to what he
> wants when talking about iron filings having a "preference". He wants a
> universe filled with purpose and free will, a universe that can in some
> sense be held morally accountable. 
> 
> One of the great tragedies of my life occurred when I was about four. My
> lifelong friend and companion TaBee had to be thrown away. As he lingers
> in
> my memory, he was maybe 10 inches tall, black and white and dingy. I
> presume
> that at some stage, outside of my ability to recall, he was clean and
> fuzzy
> and cuddly. I had cuddled him into baldness but even as his fur wore
> away
> and he lost an eye, he was my best friend. It was a harsh lesson
> learning
> that my best friend was not alive. He had no feelings. He could not talk
> back. He was immune to pain and had no sense of humor. My parents bought
> me
> a puppy but we lived in a city and the puppy ran out to the road. That
> was
> that. In the end the "death" of TaBee was harder than the death of that
> nameless pup. Sadly, no amount of rationalization then or now can
> breathe
> life and purpose into an iron filing or a teddy bear.
> 
> -KO
> When i am between
> the horns of a dilemma it does not make sense to say that all those
> transient quarks that momentarily comprise me are working together on my
> behalf to find a solution to my problem - its only slightly more
> understandable to consider that all my genes are together busy
> calculating
> to help me; no, it really only makes proper sense to say that 'I', the
> complete individual, is trying to come to a decision. In this sense, i
> think, we do have purpose and intention. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> We as creatures find it much easier to relate to other creatures.
> Preference
> and intention are so integral to our nature that we see them in
> everything.
> When my computer acts funky, and what computer doesn't, I swear at it.
> But
> this is just metaphorical. My laptop, which has replaced the bygone TaBee
> as
> my new best friend, does many things that are in fact "lifelike". I talk
> about it thinking and taking its own sweet time. But that is just the
> echo
> of my inner child. Any philosophy that attempts to imbue the universe
> with
> purpose and intent is just regressing to the intellectual equivalent of
> sucking its thumb.
> 
> But the problem with this regression runs deeper. To use your example,
> let's
> say my genes and the cells that comprise me are all agents of free will
> with
> desires and preferences all their own. Those desires and purposes have
> almost nothing to do with me. My purposes and desires may be completely
> at
> odds with those of my genes. I might get a vasectomy and my genes can
> just
> blow it out their tiny spiraled asses. When I desire to drink too much,
> my
> brain cells are sacrificed like prisoners of war on an Aztec holy day.
> My
> purposes and desires take precedence over my cells and genes. Or if they
> decide to run amok and cluster into malignant tumors, their hopes and
> dreams
> can put an end to mine. There is little or no overlap. 
> 
> We have a long history of reading purpose and intent into the inanimate
> world. Ancient peoples made gods and goddess of forces of nature but in
> the
> end those forces are so capricious and at odds with human purpose that
> the
> tales of their deeds wind up sounding ironic. Whatever purpose and
> consciousness the timeless universe might have I am pretty sure it has
> nothing good to do with me. Seeing it as alive and intentional might help
> me
> feel kinship to it. It might give me some emotional security or the hope
> that if I can relate to it well enough I can sway its judgments and bend
> its
> will to mine. Like everyone else I am drawn to the Myth of Control. If I
> cannot control my fate perhaps I can suck up to the powers that do.
> 
> It has been a hard lesson for humanity to shake loose of this illusion
> of
> consciousness in the inanimate world. I think it is childish to try to
> resurrect it.
> 
> [KO]
> All this not withstanding the fact
> that there is no detectable trace of a wispy 'I' pervading my brain or
> body
> and therefore that 'I' is really illusory along with any will-power i
> appear
> to have. The wikipedia page on Teleology refers to this viewpoint as
> 'intrinsic finality'.
> 
> [Krimel]
> Right, there is that watered down version of teleology that would
> classify
> the Heat Death as teleology. Unfortunately I don't think that is the kind
> of
> teleology Pirsig is seeking to prop up. I think he is trying to construct
> a
> philosophical thumb to suck.
> 
> But don't let me get away with ignoring your point about the illusory
> "I".
> "I" just don't have time for that ATM.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to