At 12:14 PM 4/19/2009, you wrote:
[Marsha]
I assume that you consider your patterns to be conventionally
true. I consider my patterns to be conventionally true. Since there
conventional truth (patterns) are relational and ever-changing and do
not represent an Absolute Truth, I will let this post turn to dust in the
wind.
[Krimel]
More or less... On the "less" side, I think that "conventional" true is
shared truth. It requires the agreement of two or more. Or as Jesus might
have said it arises when three or more are gathered in its name.
Individually you and I may have idiosyncratic concepts and understandings
which we do not share. In fact you could argue that all concepts are
idiosyncratic. They are conventional only to the extent that we share them
or derive them from the shared intellectual level of our culture.
[Marsha]
Besides, I totally melted with you story of TaBee story. You are
such a sweetheart!
[Krimel]
Thanks, but we both know I have a real tendency to be an ass much of the
time.
Krimel,
By conventional truth I mean a pattern that is relational,
ever-changing and conceptually constructed. What of a conventional
truth is shared? Are you, six letters with some kind of relationship
to crime, shared?
Marsha
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
