On 19 May 2009 at 14:05, Ham Priday wrote: > No matter how poetic your > description of the MoQ hierarchy, it's a mechanistic paradigm that runs its > predetermined course inexorably toward cosmic "betterness", with or without > man's participation. Notwithstanding Pirsig's emphasis on Value, am I the > only one who finds this scenario cold, unyielding, and inhuman?
Hey Ham, Given that the MOQ is quite clear that the top two tiers in the hierarchy are man made in response to Dynamic Quality I can't say the scenario is inhuman. Am I missing your point? Regards, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
