John, Gav, john said: > But gav, how are you gonna stop philosophers from > arguing? It's what we do. > What is Philosophy without argument?
gav said: > i disagree. I agree with Gav. Two things wrong with what you say John. (1) Thinking of anything as a question of one group "stopping" another doing something is a scary concept to start with. (2) Pirsgian philosophy is a philosophy of living. Individuals doing valuable things. Argument is only ever a part of it, never the point of it. One tool in the intellectual toolkit as gavin says. When all you have in your toolkit is a hammer, all problems look like nails. Regards Ian On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:43 PM, gav <[email protected]> wrote: > > hello, > >> [gav] >> >> look i think we all know by now that some are on this list >> to share and >> > learn, and some are here to argue; this list is, for >> them, the chance to >> > argue with pirsig. >> > >> > but this list is not about arguing with pirsig; it is >> not about arguing >> > with anyone. > > john: >> But gav, how are you gonna stop philosophers from >> arguing? It's what we do. >> What is Philosophy without argument? > > gav: > i disagree. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
