Ian, Gav, > > What is Philosophy without argument? > > gav said: > > i disagree. > > I agree with Gav. > Two things wrong with what you say John. > > (1) Thinking of anything as a question of one group "stopping" another > doing something is a scary concept to start with. > > (2) Pirsgian philosophy is a philosophy of living. Individuals doing > valuable things. Argument is only ever a part of it, never the point > of it. One tool in the intellectual toolkit as gavin says. >
The group/individual dynamic tension is something I wanna explore sometime. But I agree completely that argument is not the point of philosophy. The point is persuading everyone that I got the biggest tool. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
