Thanks, Gav. You're way too generous, though. As I see it, my job is to object to some of the stuff that's way, way off. I actually feel alarmed when it seems somebody is distorting the MOQ to serve some other purpose. Usually, that other purpose is religion or politics. When I see that, it conjures up the sort of feeling one would have while watching one's sister date a creepy loser. It's a combination of disgust and alarm, which produces a desire to save the beautiful thing from being tainted. But it's not as bad as all that. It's also a kind of exercise. And it's fun. I just wish my sister could screen her dates better, you know?
Gav said: > dmb has never been arrogant to me, though he has helped refine/correct my > understanding of the moq. > > this is a forum for discussing the MOQ, not nap, nlp, pps or pjbgtgb.... > dave and ant are in accord with each other, mr pirsig, and his books and > other works. ant and dave *represent* the moq and bob: this is the truth of > the situation. > > when folks argue against ant or dave chances are they are arguing against bob > and chances are they don't or won't understand his work. > > this is what i see over and over again. > > i do not see ant or dave accorded the respect they deserve, especially dave. > i therefore see nothing wrong with him defending himself and showing up his > detractors with hilarious precision: au contraire! > > egos are meant to be deflated _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage. http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
