[John]
But all things considered, I don't judge [returning to the last static latch] as the right place to go... I say we need something new.

[Arlo]
Although Platt serves up nothing but the expected anti-hippie drumbeats of the conservatives whenever its mentioned, I think its very valuable to consider that, according to Pirsig, the "Hippie Revolution" WAS the new, moral direction we should have gone.

Yes, yes... the Hippies got bogged down in confusing Dynamic with biological quality. But for where to go, or where we should have gone, its a worthwhile dialogue to go back to the beginnings of the so-called Hippie Revolution and see where they should have gone.

Some thoughts...

"From World War I until World War II the intellectuals dominated unchallenged. From World War II until the seventies the intellectuals continued to dominate, but with an increasing challenge-call it the "Hippie revolution" -which failed. And from the early seventies on there has been a slow confused mindless drift back to a kind of pseudo­Victorian moral posture accompanied by an unprecedented and unexplained growth in crime.

Of these periods, the last two seem the most misunderstood. The Hippies have been interpreted as frivolous spoiled children, and the period following their departure as a "return to values," whatever that means. The Metaphysics of Quality, however, says that's backward: the Hippie revolution was the moral movement. The present period is the collapse of values." (LILA)

"The Hippie revolution of the eighties was a moral revolution against both society and intellectuality." (LILA)

Pirsig's Catch-22 about this continues to define where we are today.

"If [intellectualism] continued to advocate more freedom from Victorian social restraint, all it would get was more Hippies, who were really just carrying its anti-Victorianism to an extreme. If, on the other hand, it advocated more constructive social conformity in opposition to the Hippies, all it would get was more Victorians, in the form of the reactionary right." (LILA)

"... more Victorians, in the form of the reactionary right"... worth noting.

"Phaedrus thought that this Hippie revolution could have been almost as much an advance over the intellectual twenties as the twenties had been over the social 1890s..." (LILA)

"The Hippie rejection of social and intellectual patterns left just two directions to go: toward biological quality and toward Dynamic Quality. The revolutionaries of the sixties thought that since both are anti-social, and since both are anti-intellectual, why then they must both be the same. That was the mistake." (LILA)

Although Pirsig doesn't give year-cutoffs as to when on the calendar the Hippie movement went astray, we can at the least infer that the "good" Hippie time was likely from around the publication of "On the Road" in 1957 until the popularized Summer of Love in 1967.

In fact, Pirsig sort of alludes to the idea that Keroac is one of the voices of this early "good Hippie" stage.

"The culture-bearing book of the period, On the Road, by Jack Kerouac, was a running lecture against intellect. ". . . All my New York friends were in the negative nightmare position of putting down society and giving their tired bookish or political or psychoanalytic reasons," Kerouac wrote, "but Dean" (the hero of the book) "just raced in society, eager for bread and love; he didn't care one way or the other."" (LILA)

Allen Ginsberg, William Burroughs, Ken Kesey and Tom Wolfe are other "good Hippies" (IMHO) whose ideas express this early "moral revolution" before the movement was derailed by indiscriminate biological degeneracy.

Pirsig's own Peyote Experience, that acted as a catalyst for his formulation of the MOQ, reflects the early Hippie ideas towards the use of mind-altering substances. As Pirsig points out, though, the language itself is clearly biased.

" The majority opposition to peyote reflected a cultural bias, the belief, unsupported by scientific or historical evidence, that "hallucinatory" experience is automatically bad. Since hallucinations are a form of insanity, the term, "hallucinogen," is clearly pejorative. Like early descriptions of Buddhism as a "heathen" religion and Islam as "barbaric," it begs some metaphysical questions. The Indians who use it as part of their ceremony might with equal accuracy call it a "de-hallucinogen," since it's their claim that it removes the hallucinations of contemporary life and reveals the reality buried beneath them.

There is actually some scientific support for this Indian point of view. Experiments have shown that spiders fed LSD do not wander around doing purposeless things as one might expect a "hallucination" would cause them to do, but instead spin an abnormally perfect, symmetrical web. That would support the "de-hallucinogen" thesis. But politics seldom depends on facts for its decisions." (LILA)

It would also place Pirsig himself squarely in the "good Hippie" category, even though these books were not published until after 1967, the Peyote Experience with Dusenberry clearly shows Pirsig as a contemporary thinker to Kerouac and Wolfe and these others.

We likely can't recreate a failed revolution, the symbolism is too entrenched, too cliche, too "old" to serve as the new direction now.

As Campbell reminds us, "Only birth can conquer death; the birth, not of the old thing again, but of something new. Within the soul, within the body social, there must be- if we are to experience long survival- a continuous “recurrence of birth” to nullify the unremitting recurrences of death. ... Peace then is a snare; war is a snare; change is a snare; permanence is a snare." (Campbell, Hero with a Thousand Faces)

But it is, I am convinced, a high quality endeavor to go back to the formations of the Hippie's moral revolution, see what it is they were trying to accomplish, what it was the early Hippies were saying, before the movement got derailed, and ask what about what they were saying made it "the next moral revolution".



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to