Craig and Ian 22 July: words Craig wrote: > > I think just the opposite. The name "MOQ" is first and foremost, > > the best name for those who hold that view of metaphysics > > themselves. And only secondarily for the "SOM" crowd.
Ian > I agree with that too Craig, and without a hint of inconsistency on my > part. Ian. SOM as Pirsig's name for the ruling metaphysics before the MOQ days is plain. as is the fact that somists must deny any SOM, at least play down it's role as just a faulty intellectual pattern that may be scoffed at. However it's intellect itself and if the MOQ is just an IPOV SOM rules. I see Craig as some Oracle (if not exactly of Delphi inhaling fumes ;) "speaking words of wisdom", and when he presents his terse sentences everybody listen. I have for years spoken against the MOQ as an idea of the idea(mind)-intellect, but only after Craig chimed in did Ron come to his senses. Now I wait for Craig to take a pro-moq stand in the "MOQ an intellectual pattern vs intellect a MOQ pattern" controversy, maybe even DMB will come to senses. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
