[John] > the verbal description is linear and > interpretative whereas with the picture, it's all there in one quick > gestaltish glance.
This is the view that the later Wittgenstein argued against. True, interpreting 'bicycle' requires knowing a language. But a picture of a red bicycle needs interpreting too. Does it mean a generic bicycle, your bicycle, a metal object, a red object, an object with two wheels, something manufactured, etc.? Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
