On 9 Sep 2009 at 13:11, MarshaV wrote:

> Andre,
> 
> The minute I start to explain it, I'm intellectualizing it, separating the
> me that is explaining it from the explanation of what _it_ is like.  It was
> this realization that jolted me into agreeing with Bo.  There is the MoQ we
> intellectualize.  There is the MoQ that represents 'Quality (unpatterned and
> patterned(all spovs)) experience', which I agree with Bo should be a step
> above the Intellectual S/O Level. The 'Quality experience' is still a
> metaphor.  Every sentence I add will diminish the value, so I'll end it
> here.

Hi Marsha,

I really like what you say here. It captures a profound truth. "As a 
Dynamic understanding doesn't make the intellectual distinctions necessary to 
explain what reality is, the question goes unanswered.  All the Buddha can say 
is, 'See for yourself.' "(Lila, 32)  Also applies to art appreciation.

Thanks, 
Platt

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to