On 9/10/09 9:30 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMO your striving for higher architectural quality (or any other high > quality endeavor) is what Pirsig meant by a code of art. I don't think he > meant it as a a static pattern like a universal criteria for good art or > something like that. Instead I see the code as adopting a lifelong attitude > of doing well. Could be. But if so, it's little like saying, "Do Good" Punnishly-a Platt-a-tude. I have heard that all my life. I would like a little help on figuring out how to actually do it. That being said I do think if I had the level of understanding of the MoQ I do now, fifty years ago at the beginning of my architectural schooling it may have made a difference. But I still think that what people and societies value has to change before significant progress will be made. Which is the hope I think that most of us have in the spreading of the MoQ. Dave Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
