John to Andre: Nobody who can read can deny this one important fact.... Ham is highly intelligent. Probably much more intelligent than you or me. His vocabulary! His erudition and reasoning! You just can't fake that sort of thing. Ham is way smart.
Andre, Agree John, Ham is smart. I only wish he'd use his smartness a little less smartly. He accepts (I think) the MoQ's ontological basis (value) but rejects the epistemological basis upon which is based arguing it is not logical. However, to apply logic to this world (or even a metaphysics) is begging the question. What is logical about reality?...what is illogical about it? Not this, not that. And then his talk about subjective, sensible propriety...??? Essence does not exist. It has been systematically annihilated by Najarguna and this is 1800 years ago. Anyway, I have a feeling all my (static) knowledge is absolutely useless and I cannot make sense of my direct experience, other that thoroughly enjoying the experience. But somehow this is absolute bull. Shared experience is meaningful and not only conceptual. Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
