John to Andre: In fact, I'd say that if you can't share the experience, it doesn't really exist.
Andre: Well...Phaedrus found it very frustrating...and he was very lonely in those days..having found something of value which he couldn't share despite the fact that he knew it existed. He met with ignorance and psychiatrists. John: It's the sharing that's the conceptualization. Andre: Interesting John, but what did Phaedrus do in the classroom? Did he, in facilitating the process of finding out about and sharing Quality, share the conceptualisation of Quality or did he share the experience of Quality? This whole issue, as you know, is bugging me a bit. Are we, in everyday parlance,sharing/communicating our EXPERIENCES with eachother as PoV's? Or are we sharing CONCEPTUALISATIONS of those experiences? (Given that in any communication it is the non-verbal [non-language,non conceptual?] part which accounts for 85% of the meaning of the communication received). Also, of course: Reality = DQ/SQ DQ is ineffable and therefore beyond conceptualisation. SQ is abstracted from DQ through direct/pure experience after which a patterning takes place (or is it re-patterning?). at all static levels, not only the intellectual. I am beginning to wonder to what extent the intellectual level dominates the play in patterning the undifferentiated? Just laterally drifting. Thanks Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
