> Marsha: > John, > > I'd like some examples of non-subject/object intellectual patterns. >
John: Marsha, if I was standing behind you in a zenlike crouch, I'd probably whack you with a stick and say, "there! (not there)." But I'm not, so I can't. Sorry. Marsha: A good whacking on the head proves what about intellectual patterns? Because I cannot imagine how you define that whack as a intellectual pattern. Very dynamic, but not very intellectual. Although it might be an intelligent way of emptying my teacup of tea and filling it with stars. John: >From what I understand out of these discusssions, intellect is synonomous with objectifying. I used to define intellect more comprehensively, what you might say is mind, but I see that mind is much more comprehensive than intellect and thus a useful distinction should be made. Marsha: It can get confusing. I consider intellect and intellectual having to do with the type of patterns in the fourth level. Intelligence and intelligent I consider the activity of applying the best patterns from all four levels. It's simple (I think) and makes a clear distinction, and works for me. For example, an uneducated person can show a huge amount of intelligence, while an intellectual can prove to be not very intelligent. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
