Hi Ron & Bo, I find the best way to think about Quality is Quality(unpatterned experience and patterned experience), then the patterned experience can be broken into the four hierarchical, evolutionary levels, as the best way to divide and explain the static patterns, best way for now.
Marsha -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of X Acto Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] A Lila quote, part one. Bo: But there can't be two basic understandings (metaphysics) Ron: Why not? because you say so? thats hardly any good enough reason. Lets begin with this, exactly WHY can't there be two basic understandings? "What he had seen is that there is a metaphysical box that sits above these two boxes, Quality itself. And once he'd seen this he also saw a huge number of ways in which Quality can be divided. Subjects and objects are just one of the ways. The question was, which way was best?" Ron: Keeping in mind Bo, Quality is individual experience. To assume Quality as reality is to make an objective assumption. Quality is everchanging, Quality only exists in experience, Quality is uncertain. What is known about Quality is always limited illusional and never absolute. To understand Quality is to limit, simplify and exaggerate . What is limited simplified and exaggerated is static. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
