Hi Mark,

I doubt Pirsig has (other can correct me), but it was a Pirsig scholar
that previously put me onto this Alexander view of emergence through
levels of complexity - now well established as evolutionary theory.

Nothing new under the sun ... except for "emergent qualities" ... I
like that ;-)

Regards
Ian

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:40 AM, markhsmit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I was caught up in the concept of emergence, so I turned to the
> Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu).
> I got stuck reading about British Emergentism.  This has probably
> already been discussed before in this forum because it appears to
> be similar to MoQ, in some ways.  Take the following two summary
> paragraphs (some parts removed):
>
> 1.4 Summary of British Emergentism
>
> Let us sum up our discussion of the British Emergentists. Common to all these 
> theorists is a layered view of nature. The world is divided into discrete 
> strata, with fundamental physics as the base level, followed by chemistry, 
> biology, and psychology (and possibly sociology). To each level corresponds a 
> special science, and the levels are arranged in terms of increasing 
> organizational complexity of matter, the bottom level being the limiting case 
> investigated by the fundamental science of physics.
>
> Crucial to an account of emergence, however, is a view concerning 
> the relationship of such levels. On this score, we find that there are, in 
> fact, two rather different pictures of emergence, one represented by Mill and 
> Broad, and the other represented by Alexander. For Mill and Broad, emergence 
> involves the appearance of primitive high-level causal interactions that are 
> additional to those of the more fundamental levels. Alexander, by contrast, 
> is committed only to the appearance of novel qualities and associated, 
> high-level causal patterns which cannot be directly expressed in terms of the 
> more fundamental entities and principles. But these patterns do not 
> supplement, much less supersede, the fundamental interactions. Rather, they 
> are macroscopic patterns running through those very microscopic interactions. 
> Emergent qualities are something truly new under the sun, but the world's 
> fundamental dynamics remain unchanged.
>
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties-emergent/
>
> Does Pirsig discuss this philosophy?
>
> Mark
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to