Platt to Arlo: So we're back to "Oops" -- suddenly there appeared a pattern that responded to DQ. You really depend on miracles, don't you? Just a theist at hear.
Arlo You can keep thumping that Pee Wee, Platt, but its just sad. And it makes you look like a fool. And desperate. (Andre... see, what did I tell you, The Pee Wees are really starting to fly!) Platt: Now comes the predictable ad hominem attack, the last refuge of a loser. One would expect better on a site devoted to Quality. But alas . . . Andre: Platt in Lila's Child, p 66: ' As I understand it, the MoQ equates Quality with direct experience. In turn, experience creates static patterns of value. The problem is- how could inorganic static patterns be created unless inorganic entities like atoms were able to experience? RMP, Annotation 30: 'I think the answer is that inorganic objects experience events but do not react to them biologically,socially or intellectually. They react to these experiences inorganically, according to the laws of physics'. Platt: If atoms don't experience, at what level did experience arise? And, how could experience arise from a lower level of no experience? RMP,Annotation 31: Since experience is the starting point, it doesn't arise from a lower level of no experience. Logically speaking, a starting point that arises from something else is no longer a starting point'. Funny this. See the resemblences? Analogues upon analogues upon analogues and history seems to be repeating itself and appears to be teaching very little.This is a comment on static patterning! Cheers Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
