On 20 Nov 2009 at 11:34, Andre Broersen wrote: > Platt: > To be precise, all concepts such as "time" and explanatory dimensions" > are intellectual PoV. Which brings to mind Bo's idea that the MOQ is > transconceptual and therefore timeless, which fits with Quality being > outside definition. Maybe we're getting somewhere after all. > > Andre: > This is interesting Platt. Before I respond,( I haven't had 'time' to > respond to Bodvar's post yet) can you tell me what you mean by 'the > MoQ' being 'transconceptual'? > > I thought Pirsig was quite clear when he said that the MoQ is a static > intellectual PoV ( or does your 'transconceptual' say something > important about the intellectual level as well)? > > Cheers > Andre
Hi Andre, What I meant by transconceptual is knowledge beyond definition, beyond words, "undifferentiated without conceptual distinctions." It refers to our meta-sense, a higher form of understanding that recognizes the beauty of the Parthenon and the truth of Godel's Theorem, a tuning fork in the brain than hums when we stumble upon something of exceptionally high quality -- like the MOQ.. Regards, Platt Regards, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
