Not trying to be a reductionist in any way, but this discussion about the relation between Quality and Time has got me thinking. There must be a fundamental relation of some kind between the two because the only way we can experience Quality is over time. In order for any thing to be better, it must move toward betterness over time - that is, Good is really only comprehensible in evolutionary terms, a narrative, and thus Quality is either an aspect of time, or closely related to it. For sure sq has a time component - that is, by definition that which is static is that which remains the same over TIME.
John, Just playing with this for now. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]>wrote: > Platt: > To be precise, all concepts such as "time" and explanatory dimensions" > are intellectual PoV. Which brings to mind Bo's idea that the MOQ is > transconceptual and therefore timeless, which fits with Quality being > outside definition. Maybe we're getting somewhere after all. > > Andre: > This is interesting Platt. Before I respond,( I haven't had 'time' to > respond to Bodvar's post yet) can you tell me what you mean by 'the > MoQ' being 'transconceptual'? > > I thought Pirsig was quite clear when he said that the MoQ is a static > intellectual PoV ( or does your 'transconceptual' say something > important about the intellectual level as well)? > > Cheers > Andre > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
