Platt to Andre: Sounds right to me. But in the Copleston papers Pirsig had this cautionary note about "intuition."
"Intuition sometimes is an equivalent of Dynamic Quality. However, it also a kind of biological instinct. Since Western philosophy confuses these two, the MOQ avoids the term." I think what you and I describe could also be termed "mystic understanding." Andre; Thanks for this Platt. I suppose within the MoQ this (mystic) understanding, together with creativity, originality, inventiveness, imagination, unstuckness (ZMM,p273) belong at the Code of art 'level'? A question popped in my head just now: can it not be argued that the 'code of art' level is 'operative' within/without all static levels? Mmmm, need to think about this...and its implications as possibility Thanks Platt Andre. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
