Ron: Hello Andre, certainly Bo will simply color your statement as the SOM language/reality restatement of subject/object. The importance is the realization of the distinction between concepts and experience. A pertanant pitfall that Bo seems to dance in and out of without bothering to take into account in his formulations.
In my recent conversation with Matt, we have been exploring this distinction especially by what we mean by using the term "experience". Aristotle in "Metaphysics" terms experience as composed of memory. The point being that the line between the two is considerably blurred. I think this is where Bo is coming from but his penchant for superiority gets in his way of any clear explaination of his point of view Andre: Hi Ron, and thank you for following this thread. When you say; 'The importance is the realization of the distinction between concepts and experience' you point to something important and I am still not sure to what extent Bodvar mixes them up. Having gone through the archives I came across Paul Turner's 'Two Theses' argument and Anthony talks about these in his PhD.( Najarguna's Middle Way between the 'Absolute' (direct experience') and the 'conventional way' i.e. the, conceptual/intellectual world of everyday affairs) Indeed the 'difference' can be regarded as a dynamic one/conventional one, and it is good that there is tension between the two but Bodvar is aware of this distinction (I hope) as this 'difference' is, as far as I understand it the DQ/SQ configuration. Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
