Dearest Platt, I'm not the one complaining. kisses -Ron
----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 5:12:26 PM Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost Are you pinning a rose on yourself? And what are you doing about anything? Still waiting for your original idea. On 2 Dec 2009 at 12:30, X Acto wrote: > I advocate not blindly repeating others opinions without > a bit of research and investigation, > let us know too when to actually do something about > what you're griping about so we may all likewise applaud you as well. > > > > Platty want a cracker? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 3:23:48 PM > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost > > Not many. You advocated not repeating other's ideas. Glad to see most > of your ideas are also repeating other's, just like everyone else with the > possible exceptions of Plato, Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein and Adam > Smith. If you have an original idea, be sure to point it out so we can all > applaud. > > > On 2 Dec 2009 at 10:05, X Acto wrote: > > > How many have you had Platt? count'em.. > > take off your socks if that helps > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 12:19:38 PM > > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost > > > > Thanks. "Not many" That's what I thought. > > > > > > On 2 Dec 2009 at 7:54, X Acto wrote: > > > > > Not many but I research the ideas that have meaning to me > > > and instead of bitching about them from my armchair > > > on my fat ass I actually get up and do somthing > > > about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:47:29 AM > > > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost > > > > > > What original ideas have you had, Ron? > > > > > > > > > On 2 Dec 2009 at 7:23, X Acto wrote: > > > > > > > Whose a environmentalist? I simply advocate using your own > > > > mind and not the repeating of others ideas. > > > > The problem is laziness.. > > > > I advocate getting off your duff and quit bitchin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:14:17 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost > > > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > > > Well said! Note how environmentalists plead for reasonableness while > > > > at the same time prominent climate scientists manipulate temperature > > > > data to support global warming and assure continuance of millions in > > > > climate-change funding. > > > > > > > > Platt > > > > > > > > On 1 Dec 2009 at 21:07, markhsmit wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Environmentalists v Capitalists? Hmm that is an interesting pair. > > > > > I suppose capitalists is used in a derogatory fashion by those > > > > > who went out and bought a computer to join in the forum. > > > > > > > > > > The problem that I have with some environmentalist is that they think > > > > > they know the Truth. They are righteous and believe everyone > > > > > should believe the way they do otherwise they are less than human. > > > > > In this way, they try to control things the way they think is right. > > > > > I agree > > > > > with Platt, that sometimes it is nice to see that they are just as > > > > > devious > > > > > and manipulative as the rest of the evil capitalists. It is this > > > > > righteous > > > > > sense of morality that many environmentalists have that somehow > > > > > elevates them to a more religious level that is annoying. It is > > > > > another > > > > > PC abuse. > > > > > > > > > > Capitalists try to live well as best they know. They are a little > > > > > excessive > > > > > perhaps and their infatuation with wealth is a bit annoying as well, > > > > > but to > > > > > each his own. I am not going to force anyone to be a capitalist or > > > > > a spiritualist, tell or force them how to live. We are not going to > > > > > be allowed > > > > > to buy plasma TVs in California now because of somebody's opinion. > > > > > What is that all about? Oh, saving the planet, but from what, our > > > > > desire to live > > > > > as we want to? Couldn't have that, we are so stupid. > > > > > > > > > > We can no more control the fate of the planet than we can live under > > > > > a dictatorship. It is all about control, not about concern. Best > > > > > thing > > > > > that happened for environmentalism is the recession. The deeper > > > > > it goes, the more we save the planet. Best if the US just imploded. > > > > > Reasonable environmentalism? That is an oxymoron. > > > > > > > > > > IMHO > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
