On 12/6/09 10:38 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 10:38 PM Ham wrote: I suspect you may be confused by my terminology. "Reality" in my vernacular connotes what REALLY (ultimately) IS. "Existence" is that which only appears to be, and 'existents' are the finite beings we experience. <snip> Hi Ham and all, I am sorry, Ham, your Idealism is showing. In your terminology the lack of an existence that could accept a division like DQ/SQ makes communication with you on a metaphysical level, a pouring from the empty into the void. Existence is prior to reality. A judgment of Reality without existence is idealism. Realism is a further judgment about the reality of existence. Joe > I suspect you may be confused by my terminology. "Reality" in my vernacular > connotes what REALLY (ultimately) IS. "Existence" is that which only > appears to be, and 'existents' are the finite beings we experience. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
