Interesting Mary ... That point that intellect "should" know better than SOMist intellect (to endlessly reduce and logically dissect) was precisely my point. Agreed.
I say interesting, because it is Bo who continually wants to bottom out the logic with SOMist intellect. Regards Ian On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Mary Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > [Ian] > My view is that this "ambiguity" - a paradoxical aspect - is its > strength. When the "as if" telos is added to a more reductionist > Darwinian take on causation, then moral behaviour is all too > predictable, now and in future - that doesn't make it uniform. The > problem is most people still look to SOMist arguments to justify their > predictions - and are surprised when they fail, as any SOMist argument > containing a paradox will. > > [Mary] > The Intellectual level abhors a paradox as much as the Social level abhors > an athiest. Difference is, the Intellectual level is smart enough to know > there are things out there it cannot dissect with rationality - or it > should. > > Fortunately, Bodvar comes to my rescue. Is Quality absolute or relative? > Bo weighs-in in a most decisive way. Were it absolute, it would beg the > question of where THAT came from, and that, and that, and that... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
