Hi Dan, On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Krimel <[email protected]> wrote: >> [Steve] >> The intellectual level of evolution is the collection of all intellectual >> patterns of value. >> >> [Krimel] >> Exactly! > > Dan: > Not exactly. Evolution isn't a level, is it? Evolution is what drives > the levels. Evolutionary history is what the levels have in common. > > Now, what Steve might mean is, the evolution of the intellectual level > is a collection of all intellectual patterns of value. But doesn't > that go without saying?
Steve: I'm not saying that evolution is a level. The phrase "intellectual level of evolution" is nothing meant to be controversial. The intellectual level, like all the static levels, is a level in an evolutionary hierarchy of value patterns. That's all I meant. I agree that saying that the intellectual level is the collection of all intellectual patterns of values should go without saying. It is a shame that it doesn't when it comes to Bo. The intellectual level for him is "the value of the subject/object aggregate." He sees each level as a single value rather than a collection of value patterns of a given type, but I am sure you are already aware of his take on the MOQ. Best, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
