Krimel, Dan,
Krimel: > Or that there is > > something, anything, that is Absolutely impossible? > > Dan: > Absolutely not. > > John: I disagree. Royce builds a pretty effective argument for the Absolute impossibility of the non-existence of error. Make one twitch, either one of you and I'll unleash it upon you. > > > > If not then static and dynamic are indeed relative terms. I would say > > guesstamits of probability. > > Dan: > So you're saying all there is is static quality. Dynamic quality is > only a synonym for change. If we don't understand it now, it's only a > matter of time until we do. > > That's not right. And I don't know. I guess that's all I can say about > that. > > > > >> [Dan] > >> Thanks Krimel, and good to have you back, > >> > >> [Krimel] > >> Thanks Dan, but relax I won't be here long. > >> > > [Dan] > > Me either. > > > > [Krimel] > > Here's hoping you mean that in John's "philosophical" sense. > > Dan: > Oh you know me... I pop in from time to time but like a good guest I > never stay long. > > Dan > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
