Greetings Bo, I cannot untangle what you are getting at.
I use what is true to my experience. How's this: I have awareness of Quality as unpatterned experience and patterned experience. I'm not saying anything about DQ; it much to big for me to grasp, besides DQ is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. or The MoQ says there is Quality: Dynamic Quality (indivisible, undefinable and unknowable)and static quality (patterns/ analogues). Marsha says she is aware of Quality as unpatterned experience and patterned experience. Please notice I didn't use the phrase 'destroy DQ' or 'unpatterned bliss'. Marsha On Jan 5, 2010, at 2:36 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi again Marsha > > 4 Jan. you said > >> I have nothing to say about DQ, it is indivisible, undefinable and >> unknowable. Please understand this. I talk only of my experience of >> Quality as unpatterned experience and patterned experience. The >> disguise is your projection. > > We may be driving ourselves mutually nuts over this issue. What you > say about DQ is what there can be said about DQ and this is said by > the MOQ. What irks me is the notion that even saying/writing this > makes DQ some lesser article than the real DQ "out there" i.e. Pirsig's > Quality/MOQ "super-metaphysics" that overrides the MOQ. > > Bodvar > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
