Steve to Ham: If, on the other hand, you see your participation here as only for the purpose of promoting your Essentialism, I'm not interested in having a conversation with you. That sounds unfriendly, but I don't mean it to be. I'm just really not interested right now in that brand of philosophy.
No, Quality is not viewed as cognizant. Chicken and egg again. It may be worth the effort to understand and appreciate Pirsig as a fellow artist. Ham: > For your information I have not only read ZMM, LILA, the SODV paper, and > Ant's doctorial, but have "chewed over" them for six years. Steve: Excellent! Andre: Hi Steve, I usually do not piss people off who have a genuine question and show genuine interest. Ham's response to your efforts have vindicated my response to Ham. And I am not real happy about this. But Ham is a cognizant proprioceptive valuing subjective agent. And will not change his ways. Same as Platt. Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
