Hi and goodbye Magnus 16 Jan. you wrote:
> I've spent quite a bit of thinking on the levels and I'd stick my nose > out and say that I have a good understanding of what constitutes a new > level. It has nothing to do with what appeals to me, you or anyone. > It's simply completely different ways to build stuff. What the MOQ doesn't need is more obscure levels. No doubt you have been thinking, but I'm afraid it's a scientific - physicist-like - kind of thinking like Doug Renselle and his inscrutable tables of sub- inorganic - quantum - levels. The MOQ is more about the moral struggles that occur in the wake of the static train, which is what gives it its enormous explanatory power. What struggles and moral codes forming between some obscure sub-inorganic isn't very instrumental. What appeals is what have Quality and yours has zero such, l should have known better. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
