Krimel stated to Mary, January 26th 2010:
> As for the questions How and Why I think the difference is between questions
> that can be meaningfully answered and questions that can't. Pirsig answer to
> Baggini is really just demonstrates why Baggini had to ask the question in
> the first place.
>
> Pirsig make no pretext at being a biologist but when some one piles up
> enough misstatements like this, it does tend to detract from his credibility
> in other areas as well.
>
> I for one am eager to hear from Dr. McWatt on this. My question for him was:
>
> I notice you avoided my question about the Baggini interview. Does that mean
> we are in agreement, Pirsig blew it? Weren't you the moderator or e-mail
> gatekeeper on that exchange?
>
> Did Baggini really give Pirsig a pass and ask no follow-up question or was
> he denied the opportunity?
>
> Ant?
Ant McWatt
comments:
Krimel, I'll post a fuller answer to your last post to me when I've had time to
catch-up with all the recent posts about this issue (especially those from Mary
and Steve Peterson) but, in the meantime, I can confirm that Julian Baggini
was free to ask Pirsig anything. As far
as I remember the interview just came to a natural end. Also, I better say
that the interview material (being derived from around 20 e-mails) was edited
by Baggini to give it flow so his question about evolution and SOM biologists
wasn't necessarily the last one.
.
_________________________________________________________________
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
