On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: >> >> Hi Marsha, >> > > Marsha: > >> This didn't answer the question, but did put words in my mouth >> that were not said.
>> Sjteve: >> I don't mean to put words in your mouth. I was referring to this: > > Marsha previously: > Would you gentlemen explain how if context and history are key factors in > determining truth (conventional), why can it not be said that truth > (conventional) is relative to context and history? It seems obvious: truth > (conventional) is relative. Marsha: You made no reference to my post of Jan 30, 2010, at 1:43 AM.; how was I to guess? I do not agree that the charge of relativism should be considered an extreme. One can assume it is an extreme, of course, but on what basis? Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
