Mark said to dmb:
...And, for the record, Quality is fixed, it's expression in terms of evolution 
is not.  Do not confuse the two.

dmb says:
Well, to use "fixed" in relation to Quality is an extremely unfortunate use of 
terms. That is exactly what Pirsig denies in ZAMM's final culminating scenes. 
There he says that Plato's big mistake was to convert the Good into a "fixed, 
eternal form" and of course that's why he adopts the term "dynamic", which 
means "not fixed". 

Mark continued:
If Quality is reality, then you are saying that Reality is not fixed.  


dmb says:
Yes, exactly. That's the main idea. 


Mark continued:
Even if Reality is everchanging, that does not mean that it is not Reality.  We 
are talking about absolutes here.  Even an ever-changing perception can be 
absolute in its change.  That horses run can be absolute even if they all run 
at different speeds, or if some only run in their dreams.  Perhaps not a good 
example, but hopefully you know what I mean.

dmb says:

When I was in college my girlfriend and I took a trip to NYC and one day when 
we were walking over to the park a couple of high school girls stopped us and 
asked us to participate in a little survey. They wanted to if either of us 
thought there was anything that is permanent or eternal. I laughed and said, 
"Yea, change. Change is the only thing that never changes". If that's what you 
mean, I'd agree.

Mark said:
For the record, imo, Ham adds to the discussion.


dmb says:

Hmmm. I'm pretty sure you're wrong about that. It could just be that I deleted 
it without reading it, but I've never seen anything from Ham that adds to the 
discussion, not about the MOQ anyway. As I see it, Ham has never done anything 
except defend SOM, which is the MOQ's central enemy. This would be interesting 
if he first understood why the MOQ attacks it and then disagreed through some 
kind of critical engagement but instead it is apparently a defense born of 
complete incomprehension of what's going on here. Sorry, but that's how I see 
it. It's nothing personal, you understand. He seems like a decent person but as 
a philosopher his contributions in this forum are nil. 





                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to