DmB said:

The short answer is basically just that Rorty is all about the linguistic 
whereas classical pragmatists are all about experience. This is not to deny 
that conversation counts as experience, of course, but experience is a much 
larger category that also includes, importantly, non-verbal experience. This is 
the big difference. For James, Dewey and Pirsig this non-verbal category is 
quite central to the whole project. In Pirsig's case, for example, the 
non-verbal is Dynamic Quality. If you take that out of the MOQ, you get the 
metaphysics of nothing. 

Ron replies:
Experience, whether verbal or non-verbal is predicated on meaning. The main 
point
Aristotle makes. Meaning is largely culturally defined. Thus he maintained how
we understand experience is largely culturally defined.   Experience, for 
Aristotle
was based on limit through limit unity through unity understanding, so the 
understanding
of experience is through complex relations of very broad generalizations of 
meaning.
I think thats the best any Pragmatist can say about it.

I'm not sure I agree with your assertion that Dynamic Quality is non verbal, 
it's too
broad a generalization that supports a correspondance viewpoint. Dynamic Quality
as I understand the term, means the plural, the unrecognizable, the defiance of 
understanding, the unlimited, flux, ect...

The Greeks had it together, Elenchus demonstrated how language is reduced to 
such
broad generalizations of meaning in experience. Pirsig, in my opinion improves 
apon the whole
Pragmatic enterprise with the division of the good into four types. These four 
types
of Pragmatic truths often conflict, but when they support eachother in conflict 
or
in harmony, we call it "true" in the general meaning of the term.

To me "Pragmatic truth" is to understand what we mean when we term something
as good or true and how we arrive at those meanings.

To recap, I feel to condemn the "we're suspended in language" as mere words 
divorced
of experiential meaning is overlooking how natural languages form the 
understanding
of immediate experiences, that even the most raw response of stimuli is an 
understanding
of experience based in memory of one sort or another. value requires it.

-Ron






                     
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to