Arlo said:
The problem, as I closed my post with, is not in the form, 
but in the impetus to literalize. I also might say that some 
forms of symbolic encoding have been so cemented over 
the years, it is really hard to get past this illusion.
...
"Definitions" tend towards literal, "approach" tends 
towards metaphor (the way I use them in my post). What 
we forget ... is that "literal" is really a dead metaphor, or a 
very cemented one. Hey, don't get me wrong, we depend 
a lot on literalized language.

Matt:
Sure, but what I was trying to punch up is the point at 
which you have to say, because of how you've arranged 
things, that "we depend a lot on" "this illusion."

I'm wondering what the point is in saying that we depend 
on illusions.  It seems like a concession to paradox-mongers.  
And, too, why is the "impetus to literalize" a problem?  If 
literalized symbolic codes are otherwise called "typical 
communication" (or "how I order a burrito"), then where, 
exactly, is the problem?  I do, after all, successfully attain 
burritos.

I'm requesting more refinement in the literal/metaphorical 
distinction.  I agree about symbols, that they are dead 
metaphors, I just think moving past illusion-talk is a good, 
next step in trying to figure out how best to frame the 
contrast between Dynamic and static.  I think a lot of 
illusion-talk obscures, muddies, and misleads us in 
relationship to what Dynamic Quality is.

If "finger pointing at the moon" is an acceptable locution 
for describing DQ, then once one becomes post-SOM/illusion, 
when does that locution become a definition?  Why is it 
that when I say "DQ is X," if I fill it in with "a finger pointing 
at the moon" I get hurrahs, but if I fill it in with "a neuron 
firing in the brain" I get boos?

In other words: have you ever noticed that the linguistic 
signal for a "definition" is exactly the same as the 
linguistic signal for a "metaphor"?

Definition: "A rose _is_ a plant with thorns on it."
Metaphor: "My love _is_ a rose."

Matt
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to