> Hi John.
> I haven't given up on bringing some enlightenment to K-class :-)
>

 You are a brave teacher.




> 9 Feb.:
> you said many things in: response to my too many things, so  I have
> decided to concentrate on this single paragraph because to
> understand the MOQ requires an understanding the difference
> between the S/O distinction as a static value and as reality itself - as
> SOM!
>
> John:
> > You seem to have a problem with reason.  It seems like you don't
> > believe its reasonable for reason to realize its own limitations. ...
>
> But a MOQ adherer is supposed to have problems with reason, not
> reason in the "ability to think straight" sense, but in the "straight
> thinking reveals that existence's fundamental divide is the S/O" sense.
> Pirsig's original target was reason in the latter sense and by and by he
> found that this reason had arrived with the Greeks and then the
> ensuing arguments in ZAMM which ends with S/O-reason (aka SOM)
> becoming a subset of Quality.  And from then on things were
> supposed to be cleared up, but so many go on thinking that there is an
> internal realm where concepts about the world  reside, and that these
> two realms are existence's fundamental split. I don't say more, my
> arm-length posts are just a waste. Do you follow me this far?
>
> Bodvar
>
>
yes, reading back to you,

Your arm-length posts are a waste.

For many, the divide between subjects and objects is the divide that defines
their existence.

But then I'm lost.

You say SOM is a subset of Quality, and you equate S/O reasoning with S/O
metaphysics.

I say SOM can't be  a subset of Quality because the definition of SOM is
that there is no such thing as Quality except as a subjective evaluation.
 Therefore, to postulate Quality as existentially fundamental is to
over-throw the "M" of SOM and put a MoQ in its place.

How about you rechew that and then we'll see from there.


John K.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to