[Dave]
And I say you, DMB, RMP, and any others of the liberal persuasion can't have it
both ways. You can't on one hand say socialism is moral, intellectual pattern
superior to capitalism. Then turn right around and claim as you did above that
capitalism is an intellectual pattern. 

[Arlo]
Again, Dave, like many of the conservative persuasion, you're arguing against
something that exists only in your own head.

"Capitalism" is a theory. Like "socialism". Like "quantum physics". Where it is
immoral is that it proposes to allow social patterns to dominate intellectual
patterns. The "practice" or "system" of "capitalism" is a social system, as are
all economic and market systems. Capitalism (the theory, an intellectual
pattern) proposes that this market system (a social system) dominate
intellectual patterns. THAT is Pirsig's argument, and its a valid one.

[Dave]
So again you are saying that RMP did not say what he said. He said that "a
society guided by" [capitalism] is guided by "mindless traditions". But they
work. But with as you below with serious problems:

[Arlo]
Capitalism, as a theory (intellectual pattern), champions a society guided by
social patterns, yes. It works because of the Dynamic element in the market.
But, yes, there is a host of problems with the current system, as noted
throughout ZMM. 

[Dave]
But to correct the errors of capitalism we need to figure out a way to shift to
an economic system which more accurately weights a much wider array of values
with as few impositions of government(s) as possible.

[Arlo]
Its all about balance. 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to