John said, "Between the angry bull horn of the religiously certain, and the angry bull horn of the anti-religiously certain, we have the middle way of the MoQ - which says Good is real but cannot be defined."
And later "And I don't think the MoQ should be pushing religion, I also don't think it should be pushing anti-religion." Agreed. Picking up on one phrase - to link to DMB's other current argument ... "Good is real but cannot be defined." What is defined in the MoQ is the process by which good is bettered - evolving hierarchical patterns (species) of good. But "good " itself is unatainable - a mystical dream. Regards Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
