Heya Platt, On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey John, > > Maybe you got off on the wrong foot with your analysis. Bo has never > claimed that SOM is intellect as you imply in your first sentence. Rather, > SOM as created and defined by Pirsig is the value of the subject-object > division of reality (direct experience). That a metaphysical stance that subjects and objects comprise all reality is "a" intellectual value I can see. But calling it "the" value confuses me because it implies intellect can only put objectivism as its highest value. Which denies many of the intellectual accomplishments of non-objectivist societies in history and the world. Oh. I see. That is Bo's stance. Nevermind. John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
