Andre 11 Mar.you wrote > Just as an addendum. Here in China it is inappropriate to show emotions > 'in public' i.e. socially. I have often wondered why and the MoQ does > suggest an explanation. I get the impression that it is seen as a lower > pattern of value (in this case [organic] level emotions) 'interfering' > with/ dominating, a higher level of values i.e. the social. Just an > 'aha'.
"Public" does not necessarily mean Q-social value. The intellect- steeped West and the Orient that has surpassed intellect but still has it as part of their make-up both regard public display of emotions (the social expression par exellance) as inappropriate, while the social- steeped Muslim culture makes burial ceremonies (for instance) a great show of wailing, ashes-in-hair, hands to heaven, firing of guns in the air ...etc.. Likewise is burning of effigies and flags a great outlet of rage if someone has offended Mohammed, this because the social level is their focus while they regard intellectual value as something that must be prevented from invading their world. Organic or biological patterns aren't regarded as "inappropriate" or offensive. If a person for example gets sick and vomits in the public it's regarded with sympathy, everyone knows that it was involuntarily, that goes for more examples of bodily needs and musts. Drop this silly emotions as biology it's still-born. To prevent you from zooming in on every small point. The main social- over-biology struggle that took place as the 3rd. level started to spread ages ago was of course not about "house training" people, this biological shamelessness is something very far down in that realm, nor was it of promoting emotions, rather emotions were what created the social coherence. Bodvar. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
