Hi Marsha
The problem here is that you've defined everything but subjects and
objects out of the equation! Your starting point is to define the
Intellectual level as consisting of only subjects and objects and then
say that it's all subjects and objects because that's how it's defined.
On Mar 30, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Horse wrote:
/ Hi Marsha
/>>/
/>>/ Process metaphysics is written in the same language as SOM, Shakespeare,
/>>/ King Charles bible, Wikipedia, the C++ Standard Library, this mailing
list AND MoQ.
/> All you list are subject/object oriented.
So the MoQ is now S/O oriented!!!
For me there is a Quality Level where
Reality is Quality(unpatterned experience& patterned experience), and as of
yet, no language (except possible when used poetically) properly communicates
that reality. Even within physics there is no way yet to intellectualize what
is
still in its infancy of discovery and understanding. I like best the
possibilities
for entanglement. But I will admit I know very little.
Quality level? There is no Quality level - you're now trying to
subjugate Quality to a static pattern of Value. This is what levels are
- static patterns of Value. Yes, Quality is Reality, according to the
MoQ and can be subdivided into Dynamic Quality (Unpatterned Experience
[UE]) and Static Quality (Patterned experience [PE] otherwise known as
static patterns of Value - or the levels of the MoQ). What you appear to
be saying is that there is a fifth level of Value (static - has to be
because it's a level) which is Quality. So now Quality (reality)
consists of DQ and SQ (UE and PE) where SQ (PE) also contains Quality!!!!!
No wonder no language can properly communicate that reality.
This is what I meant when I said that Bo's interpretation has mangled
the MoQ.
/ If your point is that because we "use subjects and objects [and] the
associated
/>>/ rules for their manipulation" then the Intellectual level is strictly S/O
then the
/>>/ MoQ, which is written in the same language, is also at this same level.
So the
/>>/ MoQ is part of the Intellectual level - which is not what you or Bo
appear to
/>>/ be saying.
/
Yes, there is the SOM explanation of the MoQ, where it is intellectually
presented
and explained as a theory: ZMM, LILA, SODV, etc.,
It's not a SOM explanation it's just an explanation in English and
shows quite clearly that SOM and MoQ are Intellectual patterns of Value.
but there is also the MoQ that
represents Reality equals Quality(unpatterned experience& patterned
experience.)
This is just a re-statement of of Pirsig's Reality = Quality = DQ + SQ.
If this MoQ represents it then how does it do this if not by S/O as you have
said.
Mary has asked, and I have asked for examples of intellectual patterns that
aren't presented as the manipulation of reified concepts and the rules for
their
manipulation, but I have seen no such examples.
And I have given examples but while you have defined them out of the picture
you will
continue to fail to see them as such.
How on earth can Zero be either subject or object when it references neither?
Or infinity?
Your process metaphysics is
most certainly a s/o presentation, hopeful for the future, but still mired in
SOM.
Process metaphysics is in direct opposition to SOM - it says so on the label!
I'm sticking with Bo. The Intellectual Level is through and through SOM.
Sorry, but Bo's Intellectual Level (and yours it would appear) may be
SOM through and through but the Intellectual level of the MoQ is
Intellectual patterns of Value. Subjects and objects are just some of
these patterns not it's entirety.
Cheers, chocolate and love,
Marsha
Big kisses
Horse
--
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an
attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine
in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what
a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
