Hello, [DMB] I might pick some nits with Sam, but this > is basically a good explanation of the form-content conflation I've > accused you of several times. Like I said, talking about the non-verbal > does not make it verbal just because you're talking about it. That > would be like saying that talking about animals means that animals are > just talk or like saying that we could only se > > e the moon landing on TV so the moon landing was really just a TV > show.
Thank you for that. Thinking about the MoQ does not make it of the Intellectual Level, and talking about it in our subject/object language does not make it equivalent to subjective-objectivity. Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
